↓ Skip to main content

Semi-automated echocardiographic quantification of right ventricular size and function

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Semi-automated echocardiographic quantification of right ventricular size and function
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10554-015-0672-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diego Medvedofsky, Karima Addetia, Jamie Hamilton, Javier Leon Jimenez, Roberto M. Lang, Victor Mor-Avi

Abstract

Although parameters of right ventricular (RV) size and function are clinically important, echocardiographic assessment of this chamber is complex. Existing quantitative approaches rely on manual measurements performed on different images, and are thus time-consuming. Consequently, in clinical practice, qualitative assessment is usually used instead. We tested a new approach for automated measurements of RV size and function using speckle tracking by comparing them to the conventional manual methodology. Transthoracic images were obtained in 149 patients with a wide range of RV size and function, and were analyzed by an expert using conventional techniques to obtain RV end-diastolic and end-systolic areas, fractional area change, dimensions (basal and mid-cavity diameters and length), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and peak systolic velocity. Same parameters were obtained using the semi-automated software (Epsilon Imaging), which requires tracing of the RV endocardial boundary in a single frame in the RV focused view. Fifteen patients were excluded due to image quality (90 % feasibility). Time required for the automated analysis was approximately 30 s per patient, compared to 4 min for conventional analysis. The parameters obtained with the semi-automated approach were in good agreement with manual measurements: r-values 0.79-0.95 for RV size and 0.70-0.74 for function indices and biases of 2-22 % of the mean measured values, which were comparable to the intrinsic variability of the conventional technique. In conclusion, the semi-automated technique is feasible, fast and provides quantitative parameters of RV size and function, which are comparable to conventional measurements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 8 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 55%
Unspecified 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Mathematics 1 5%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#1,460
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,399
of 279,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#19
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.