↓ Skip to main content

The affect of vision and compassion upon role factors in physician leadership

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The affect of vision and compassion upon role factors in physician leadership
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00442
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joann F. Quinn

Abstract

The career path for many professionals is often into a leadership role, yet many professionals do not have the competencies or inclination to lead. This study explores physician leaders as a representative group of professionals. While there have been many efforts at understanding the characteristics of effective physician leaders, a greater understanding is needed on the nature of physician leadership. The largest healthcare organization for physician leaders in the United States was surveyed to gain a greater understanding of the nature of leadership. Partial Lease Squares (PLS) was used to analyze results from 677 online surveys to understand the causal relationship of role conflict and role endorsement to participation. The findings reveal the mediating influence that positivity exerts upon participation, and offers health care leaders an opportunity to increase understanding of the social identification process that leads a higher level of professional participation, which may increase effectiveness for physicians in leadership.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 2 3%
United States 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 54 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 17 29%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 11 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 19%
Psychology 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2022.
All research outputs
#12,729,857
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,412
of 29,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,939
of 264,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#258
of 514 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 514 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.