| Title |
Individual differences in drug abuse vulnerability: d-Amphetamine and sensation-seeking status
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychopharmacology, September 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00213-006-0487-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas H. Kelly, Glenn Robbins, Catherine A. Martin, Mark T. Fillmore, Scott D. Lane, Nancy G. Harrington, Craig R. Rush |
| Abstract |
While the personality dimensions of novelty seeking and sensation seeking are associated with drug abuse vulnerability, the mechanisms associated with this vulnerability remain obscure. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 24% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 38 | 39% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#12,848,572
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#3,857
of 5,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,779
of 66,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#41
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.