Title |
Deadly Conversations: Nuclear-Mitochondrial Cross-Talk
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes, August 2004
|
DOI | 10.1023/b:jobb.0000041755.22613.8d |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Valina L. Dawson, Ted M. Dawson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Czechia | 1 | 1% |
Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 80 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 28 | 32% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 22% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 10% |
Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
Professor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 9 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 45% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 11% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 7% |
Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 12 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2015.
All research outputs
#6,741,089
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes
#89
of 491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,709
of 61,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 491 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.