↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Pharmacology of Risperidone and Paliperidone

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs in R&D, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Comparative Pharmacology of Risperidone and Paliperidone
Published in
Drugs in R&D, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40268-015-0092-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Corena-McLeod

Abstract

Antipsychotics, risperidone, and risperidone's active metabolite, paliperidone (9-hydroxyrisperidone), are related molecules used for the treatment of schizophrenia and related disorders. Differences in receptor binding, 5-HT2A/D2 (serotonin/dopamine) binding ratios, and mitochondrial proteomics suggest that the effects of risperidone and paliperidone on neuronal firing, regulation of mitochondrial function, and movement are different. This review seeks to explore the most significant differences at the molecular level between risperidone and paliperidone, as reported in preclinical studies. Although risperidone shows higher affinity for 5-HT receptors, paliperidone does not fit this profile. Thus, the risperidone 5-HT2A/D2 binding ratio is significantly lower than the paliperidone 5-HT2A/D2 binding ratio. Paliperidone, similar to lithium and valproate, affects expression levels and phosphorylation of complex I and V proteins in synaptoneurosomal preparations of rat prefrontal cortex, suggesting that paliperidone behaves as a mood stabilizer. It is apparent that the presence of a hydroxyl group in the paliperidone molecule confers increased hydrophilicity to this drug compared with its parent, risperidone; thus, this contributes to differential effects on mitochondrial movement, protein expression, and phosphorylation. These differences are reflected in synaptic plasticity and neuronal firing and have only recently been implicated in the mechanisms of mitochondrial function and movement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 10%
Student > Master 16 10%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 43 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 29 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Neuroscience 12 7%
Chemistry 8 5%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 46 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,625,018
of 24,870,516 outputs
Outputs from Drugs in R&D
#83
of 358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,138
of 269,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs in R&D
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,870,516 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them