↓ Skip to main content

New approaches for cancer immunotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
New approaches for cancer immunotherapy
Published in
Tumor Biology, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13277-015-3491-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ayfer Karlitepe, Ozgun Ozalp, Cigir Biray Avci

Abstract

Immunotherapy is a promising field that offers alternative methods for treatment of cancer. The current strategy consists of cancer vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, and cellular therapies. Cancer vaccines aim to eradicate cancer cells via immune system. Thus, they may attack these cells derived from any type of cancer, besides their role in preventing cancer. Lymphocytes and dendritic cells are often used in cellular therapy. In addition, monoclonal antibodies are designed to target specific antigens found in cancer cells. Currently, at least 12 clinically approved monoclonal antibodies are being used and many cancer vaccines are being developed with ongoing phase studies for cancer therapy. Relevant studies are focused on glioma and several other cancer types. Correspondingly, the combination of effective methods may enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. It is thought that particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors will play a crucial role in immunotherapeutic approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 23 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 23 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2015.
All research outputs
#14,953,620
of 23,923,788 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#948
of 2,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,008
of 267,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#34
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,923,788 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,624 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.