↓ Skip to main content

Adolescent Health-Risk Sexual Behaviors: Effects of a Drug Abuse Intervention

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Adolescent Health-Risk Sexual Behaviors: Effects of a Drug Abuse Intervention
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10461-011-0019-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hyman Hops, Timothy J. Ozechowski, Holly B. Waldron, Betsy Davis, Charles W. Turner, Janet L. Brody, Manuel Barrera

Abstract

Adolescents who abuse substances are more likely to engage in health-risking sexual behavior (HRSB) and are at particularly high risk for HIV/AIDS. Thus, substance abuse treatment presents a prime opportunity to target HIV-risk behaviors. The present study evaluated a one-session HIV-risk intervention embedded in a controlled clinical trial for drug-abusing adolescents. The trial was conducted in New Mexico and Oregon with Hispanic and Anglo adolescents. Youths were randomly assigned to individual cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) or to an integrated behavioral and family therapy (IBFT) condition, involving individual and family sessions. The HIV-specific intervention was not associated with change. IBFT and CBT were both efficacious in reducing HIV-risk behaviors from intake to the 18-month follow-up for high-risk adolescents. For low-risk adolescents, CBT (versus IBFT) was more efficacious in suppressing HRSB. These data suggest that drug abuse treatments can have both preventative and intervention effects for adolescents, depending on their relative HIV-risk.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Botswana 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 132 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Master 13 9%
Other 10 7%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 32 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 31%
Social Sciences 17 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 39 28%