↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial Community Diversity in Soil Under two Tillage Practices as Determined by Pyrosequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Bacterial Community Diversity in Soil Under two Tillage Practices as Determined by Pyrosequencing
Published in
Microbial Ecology, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00248-015-0609-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aditi Sengupta, Warren A. Dick

Abstract

The ability of soil to provide ecosystem services is dependent on microbial diversity, with 80-90 % of the processes in soil being mediated by microbes. There still exists a knowledge gap in the types of microorganisms present in soil and how soil management affects them. However, identification of microorganisms is severely limited by classical culturing techniques that have been traditionally used in laboratories. Metagenomic approaches are increasingly becoming common, with current high-throughput sequencing approaches allowing for more in-depth analysis. We conducted a preliminary analysis of bacterial diversity in soils from the longest continuously maintained no-till (NT) plots in the world (52 years) and in adjacent plow-till (PT) plots in Ohio, USA managed similarly except for tillage. Bacterial diversity was determined using a culture-independent approach of high-throughput pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria were predominant in both samples but the NT soil had a higher number of reads, bacterial richness, and five unique phyla. Four unique phyla were observed in PT and 99 % of the community had relative abundance of <1 %. Plowing and secondary tillage tend to homogenize the soil and reduces the unique (i.e., diverse) microenvironments where microbial populations can reside. We conclude that tillage leads to fewer dominant species being present in soil and that these species contribute to a higher percentage of the total community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 116 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 23%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 25 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 50%
Environmental Science 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 34 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#18,961,244
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#1,710
of 2,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,517
of 265,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#27
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.