↓ Skip to main content

Perioperative risk factors for acute kidney injury after liver resection surgery: an historical cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Perioperative risk factors for acute kidney injury after liver resection surgery: an historical cohort study
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12630-015-0397-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arisa Tomozawa, Seiji Ishikawa, Nobuhiro Shiota, Phantila Cholvisudhi, Koshi Makita

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the incidence and risk factors for acute kidney injury (AKI) after liver resection surgery and to clarify the relationship between postoperative AKI and outcome. We conducted a historical cohort study of patients who underwent liver resection surgery with sevoflurane anesthesia from January 2004 to October 2011. Acute kidney injury was diagnosed based on the Acute Kidney Injury Network classification within 72 hr after the surgery. Patient data, surgical and anesthetic data, and laboratory data were extracted manually from the patients' electronic charts. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify perioperative risk factors for postoperative AKI. Acute kidney injury was diagnosed in 78 of 642 patients (12.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.7 to 14.9). Multivariable analysis showed an independent association between postoperative AKI and preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.74; 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.85), preoperative hypertension (aOR 2.10; 95% CI: 1.11 to 3.97), and intraoperative red blood cell transfusion (aOR 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.07). Development of AKI within 72 hr after liver resection surgery was associated with increased hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay, and increased rates of mechanical ventilation, reintubation, and renal replacement therapy. Perioperative risk factors for AKI after liver resection surgery are similar to those established for other surgical procedures. Further studies are needed to establish causality and to determine whether interventions on modifiable risk factors can reduce the incidence of postoperative AKI and improve patient outcome. This study was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Center (UMIN 000008089).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Unspecified 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 13 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 13 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2,737
of 2,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,045
of 278,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#31
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.