↓ Skip to main content

Expert review – identification of intra-partum fetal compromise

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology & Reproductive Biology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expert review – identification of intra-partum fetal compromise
Published in
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology & Reproductive Biology, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.04.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomas Prior, Sailesh Kumar

Abstract

Whilst most cases of cerebral palsy occur as a consequence of an ante-natal insult, a significant proportion, particularly in the term fetus, are attributable to intra-partum hypoxia. Intra-partum monitoring using continuous fetal heart rate assessment has led to an increased incidence of operative delivery without a concurrent reduction in the incidence of cerebral palsy. Despite this, birth asphyxia remains the strongest and most consistent risk factor for cerebral palsy in term infants. This review evaluates current intra-partum monitoring techniques as well as alternative approaches aimed at better identification of the fetus at risk of compromise in labour.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Other 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 14 27%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2015.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology & Reproductive Biology
#3,321
of 3,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,758
of 278,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology & Reproductive Biology
#27
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.