↓ Skip to main content

The role of Epstein-Barr virus infection in the pathogenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Virologica Sinica, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
The role of Epstein-Barr virus infection in the pathogenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Published in
Virologica Sinica, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12250-015-3592-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chi Man Tsang, Sai Wah Tsao

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is closely associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. EBV episomes are detected in almost all NPC cells. The role of EBV in NPC pathogenesis has long been postulated but remains enigmatic. In contrast to infection of B lymphocytes, EBV infection does not directly transform nasopharyngeal epithelial cells into proliferative clones with malignant potential. EBV infection of normal pharyngeal epithelial cells is predominantly lytic in nature. Genetic alterations in premalignant nasopharyngeal epithelium, in combination with inflammatory stimulation in the nasopharyngeal mucosa, presumably play essential roles in the establishment of a latent EBV infection in infected nasopharyngeal epithelial cells during the early development of NPC. Establishment of latent EBV infection in premalignant nasopharyngeal epithelial cells and expression of latent viral genes, including the BART transcripts and BART-encoded microRNAs, are crucial features of NPC. Expression of EBV genes may drive further malignant transformation of premalignant nasopharyngeal epithelial cells into cancer cells. The difficulties involved in the establishment of NPC cell lines and the progressive loss of EBV epsiomes in NPC cells propagated in culture strongly implicate the contribution of host stromal components to the growth of NPC cells in vivo and maintenance of EBV in infected NPC cells. Defining the growth advantages of EBV-infected NPC cells in vivo will lead to a better understanding of the contribution of EBV infection in NPC pathogenesis, and may lead to the identification of novel therapeutic targets for NPC treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 164 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 16 10%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 36 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 42 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2015.
All research outputs
#17,758,492
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Virologica Sinica
#341
of 571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,881
of 265,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virologica Sinica
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.