↓ Skip to main content

Utility of Assessing Nerve Morphology in Central Cornea Versus Whorl Area for Diagnosing Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Utility of Assessing Nerve Morphology in Central Cornea Versus Whorl Area for Diagnosing Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Published in
Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease, July 2015
DOI 10.1097/ico.0000000000000447
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Pritchard, Cirous Dehghani, Katie Edwards, Edward Burgin, Nick Cheang, Hannah Kim, Merna Mikhaiel, Gemma Stanton, Anthony W. Russell, Rayaz A. Malik, Nathan Efron

Abstract

To compare small nerve fiber damage in the central cornea and whorl area in participants with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and to examine the accuracy of evaluating these 2 anatomical sites for the diagnosis of DPN. A cohort of 187 participants (107 with type 1 diabetes and 80 controls) was enrolled. The neuropathy disability score (NDS) was used for the identification of DPN. The corneal nerve fiber length at the central cornea (CNFLcenter) and whorl (CNFLwhorl) was quantified using corneal confocal microscopy and a fully automated morphometric technique and compared according to the DPN status. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to compare the accuracy of the 2 corneal locations for the diagnosis of DPN. CNFLcenter and CNFLwhorl were able to differentiate all 3 groups (diabetic participants with and without DPN and controls) (P < 0.001). There was a weak but significant linear relationship for CNFLcenter and CNFLwhorl versus NDS (P < 0.001); however, the corneal location × NDS interaction was not statistically significant (P = 0.17). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was similar for CNFLcenter and CNFLwhorl (0.76 and 0.77, respectively, P = 0.98). The sensitivity and specificity of the cutoff points were 0.9 and 0.5 for CNFLcenter and 0.8 and 0.6 for CNFLwhorl. Small nerve fiber pathology is comparable at the central and whorl anatomical sites of the cornea. Quantification of CNFL from the corneal center is as accurate as CNFL quantification of the whorl area for the diagnosis of DPN.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 10 25%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Psychology 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 7 18%