↓ Skip to main content

Stable isotope labeling of glycoprotein expressed in silkworms using immunoglobulin G as a test molecule

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomolecular NMR, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Stable isotope labeling of glycoprotein expressed in silkworms using immunoglobulin G as a test molecule
Published in
Journal of Biomolecular NMR, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10858-015-9930-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hirokazu Yagi, Masatoshi Nakamura, Jun Yokoyama, Ying Zhang, Takumi Yamaguchi, Sachiko Kondo, Jun Kobayashi, Tatsuya Kato, Enoch Y. Park, Shiori Nakazawa, Noritaka Hashii, Nana Kawasaki, Koichi Kato

Abstract

Silkworms serve as promising bioreactors for the production of recombinant proteins, including glycoproteins and membrane proteins, for structural and functional protein analyses. However, lack of methodology for stable isotope labeling has been a major deterrent to using this expression system for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structural biology. Here we developed a metabolic isotope labeling technique using commercially available silkworm larvae. The fifth instar larvae were infected with baculoviruses for co-expression of recombinant human immunoglobulin G (IgG) as a test molecule, with calnexin as a chaperone. They were subsequently reared on an artificial diet containing (15)N-labeled yeast crude protein extract. We harvested 0.1 mg of IgG from larva with a (15)N-enrichment ratio of approximately 80 %. This allowed us to compare NMR spectral data of the Fc fragment cleaved from the silkworm-produced IgG with those of an authentic Fc glycoprotein derived from mammalian cells. Therefore, we successfully demonstrated that our method enables production of isotopically labeled glycoproteins for NMR studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 7%
United States 1 7%
Unknown 12 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 21%
Chemistry 3 21%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2016.
All research outputs
#18,410,971
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomolecular NMR
#461
of 614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,405
of 265,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomolecular NMR
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.