↓ Skip to main content

Death Receptor 6 and Caspase-6 Regulate Prion Peptide-Induced Axonal Degeneration in Rat Spinal Neurons

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Death Receptor 6 and Caspase-6 Regulate Prion Peptide-Induced Axonal Degeneration in Rat Spinal Neurons
Published in
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12031-015-0562-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yunsheng Wang, Deming Zhao, Bo Pan, Zhiqi Song, Syed Zahid Ali Shah, Xiaomin Yin, Xiangmei Zhou, Lifeng Yang

Abstract

Axonal degeneration is a hallmark of many neurodegenerative disorders including transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE). However, the full complement of axonal degeneration triggers is not fully understood. In an in vitro prion model, we observed that treatment of rat spinal neurons with the prion peptide, PrP106-126, activated death receptor 6 (DR6, also known as TNFRSF21), caspase-6, caspase-3, and induced axonal degeneration. Knockdown of DR6 by siRNA blocked caspase-6 and caspase-3 activation and axonal degeneration. We also found that cleaved caspase-3 is only enriched in cell bodies, but cleaved caspase-6 is expressed in both cell bodies and axons. Axonal degeneration was prevented by preincubation of neurons with a caspase-6 inhibitor or siRNA of caspase-6. Our findings suggest that both DR6 and caspase-6 play important roles in axonal degeneration and caspase-6 acts downstream of DR6. We also observed that nicotinamide nucleotide adenylyltransferase 1 protein (Nmnat1), which had been reported to protect neurons from degeneration, alleviated axonal degeneration without blocking caspase-6 activation, suggesting that Nmnat acts downstream or parallel to caspase-6 activation. Our results indicate that PrP106-126 triggered axonal degeneration of the spinal cord neurons, DR6 is a key regulator of axonal degeneration, and the signaling pathway of DR6/caspase-6 mediates axonal degeneration induced by the prion fragment. Our findings raise the hope of targeting the DR6 as a potential therapeutic strategy in prion-related neurodegenerative diseases.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 23%
Neuroscience 6 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Chemistry 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#485
of 1,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,593
of 280,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,643 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.