↓ Skip to main content

Romidepsin in peripheral and cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma: mechanistic implications from clinical and correlative data

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Haematology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Romidepsin in peripheral and cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma: mechanistic implications from clinical and correlative data
Published in
British Journal of Haematology, April 2015
DOI 10.1111/bjh.13400
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan E Bates, Robin Eisch, Alexander Ling, Douglas Rosing, Maria Turner, Stefania Pittaluga, H Miles Prince, Mark H Kirschbaum, Steven L Allen, Jasmine Zain, Larisa J Geskin, David Joske, Leslie Popplewell, Edward W Cowen, Elaine S Jaffe, Jean Nichols, Sally Kennedy, Seth M Steinberg, David J Liewehr, Louise C Showe, Caryn Steakley, John Wright, Tito Fojo, Thomas Litman, Richard L Piekarz

Abstract

Romidepsin is an epigenetic agent approved for the treatment of patients with cutaneous or peripheral T-cell lymphoma (CTCL and PTCL). Here we report data in all patients treated on the National Cancer Institute 1312 trial, demonstrating long-term disease control and the ability to retreat patients relapsing off-therapy. In all, 84 patients with CTCL and 47 with PTCL were enrolled. Responses occurred early, were clinically meaningful and of very long duration in some cases. Notably, patients with PTCL receiving romidepsin as third-line therapy or later had a comparable response rate (32%) of similar duration as the total population (38%). Eight patients had treatment breaks of 3·5 months to 10 years; in four of six patients, re-initiation of treatment led to clear benefit. Safety data show slightly greater haematological and constitutional toxicity in PTCL. cDNA microarray studies show unique individual gene expression profiles, minimal overlap between patients, and both induction and repression of gene expression that reversed within 24 h. These data argue against cell death occurring as a result of an epigenetics-mediated gene induction programme. Together this work supports the safety and activity of romidepsin in T-cell lymphoma, but suggests a complex mechanism of action.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Professor 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Chemistry 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2015.
All research outputs
#19,290,136
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Haematology
#6,574
of 7,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,441
of 270,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Haematology
#69
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.