↓ Skip to main content

Critical assessment of human metabolic pathway databases: a stepping stone for future integration

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 1,131)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
citeulike
12 CiteULike
Title
Critical assessment of human metabolic pathway databases: a stepping stone for future integration
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1752-0509-5-165
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miranda D Stobbe, Sander M Houten, Gerbert A Jansen, Antoine HC van Kampen, Perry D Moerland

Abstract

Multiple pathway databases are available that describe the human metabolic network and have proven their usefulness in many applications, ranging from the analysis and interpretation of high-throughput data to their use as a reference repository. However, so far the various human metabolic networks described by these databases have not been systematically compared and contrasted, nor has the extent to which they differ been quantified. For a researcher using these databases for particular analyses of human metabolism, it is crucial to know the extent of the differences in content and their underlying causes. Moreover, the outcomes of such a comparison are important for ongoing integration efforts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 6%
Germany 2 2%
Switzerland 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 85 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 31%
Researcher 31 31%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Professor 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 18%
Computer Science 16 16%
Chemistry 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 11 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,492,054
of 25,079,131 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#20
of 1,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,604
of 141,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#2
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,079,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.