| Title |
Natural history of the Nihon (Bhd gene mutant) rat, a novel model for human Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Virchows Archiv, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00428-005-0142-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mami Kouchi, Kazuo Okimoto, Izumi Matsumoto, Kohji Tanaka, Masashi Yasuba, Okio Hino |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 23% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 15% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#2,938,685
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Virchows Archiv
#96
of 1,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,387
of 154,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virchows Archiv
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,947 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them