↓ Skip to main content

The effects of tyrosine depletion in normal healthy volunteers: implications for unipolar depression

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, September 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The effects of tyrosine depletion in normal healthy volunteers: implications for unipolar depression
Published in
Psychopharmacology, September 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00213-003-1586-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew McLean, Judy S. Rubinsztein, Trevor W. Robbins, Barbara J. Sahakian

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the role of dopamine (DA) both in the pathogenesis of unipolar depression and in motivated behaviour. The innovative technique of acute tyrosine depletion presents an opportunity to characterise further its function in these domains. The present study examined the physiological, subjective and cognitive effects of acute tyrosine depletion in healthy volunteers. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group design was employed. Half of the participants ingested a balanced amino-acid mixture (BAL) and the other half received an identical mixture except that tyrosine and phenylalanine were absent (TYR-free). Plasma amino acid concentrations and subjective ratings were monitored at both baseline (T(0)) and 5 h following consumption (T(5)) of the mixtures. A comprehensive neuropsychological test battery was also administered at T(5). Relative to the BAL group, the reduction in TYR availability to the brain was more marked in the TYR-free group. Employment of psychological rating scales revealed that, compared with the BAL group, the TYR-free group became less content and more apathetic. For the affective go/no-go task, whilst the BAL group exhibited a happy latency bias, the TYR-free group demonstrated a sad latency bias. Furthermore, in the decision-making task, the rate at which the TYR-free group increased their bets in response to more likely outcomes was lower than that of the BAL group. Taken together, these neuropsychological findings strikingly paralleled those reported in previous investigations of unipolar depression. The experimental groups could not be differentiated on any of the other neuropsychological measures, including more classical assessments of fronto-executive function. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that dopaminergic factors are particularly involved in disrupted affect/reward-based processing characteristic of clinical depression.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 105 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Master 8 7%
Other 5 5%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 19 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 10%
Neuroscience 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 22 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,485,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#356
of 5,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,501
of 54,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.