| Title |
The efficacy of long-term conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) supplementation on body composition in overweight and obese individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nutrition, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00394-011-0253-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Igho J. Onakpoya, Paul P. Posadzki, Leala K. Watson, Lucy A. Davies, Edzard Ernst |
| Abstract |
Numerous supplements containing conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) are presently being promoted for body weight reduction. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the evidence for or against the long-term efficacy of CLA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 18% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Poland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 35% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 29% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 167 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 16% |
| Researcher | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 22% |
| Unknown | 21 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 11 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2023.
All research outputs
#436,322
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#130
of 2,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,605
of 148,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.