↓ Skip to main content

In-silico analysis of the structure and binding site features of an α-expansin protein from mountain papaya fruit (VpEXPA2), through molecular modeling, docking, and dynamics simulation studies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Modeling, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
In-silico analysis of the structure and binding site features of an α-expansin protein from mountain papaya fruit (VpEXPA2), through molecular modeling, docking, and dynamics simulation studies
Published in
Journal of Molecular Modeling, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00894-015-2656-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Gaete-Eastman, Luis Morales-Quintana, Raúl Herrera, María Alejandra Moya-León

Abstract

Fruit softening is associated to cell wall modifications produced by a set of hydrolytic enzymes and proteins. Expansins are proteins with no catalytic activity, which have been associated with several processes during plant growth and development. A role for expansins has been proposed during softening of fruits, and many fruit-specific expansins have been identified in a variety of species. A 3D model for VpEXPA2, an α-expansin involved in softening of Vasconcellea pubescens fruit, was built for the first time by comparative modeling strategy. The model was validated and refined by molecular dynamics simulation. The VpEXPA2 model shows a cellulose binding domain with a β-sandwich structure, and a catalytic domain with a similar structure to the catalytic core of endoglucanase V (EGV) from Humicola insolens, formed by six β-strands with interconnected loops. VpEXPA2 protein contains essential structural moieties related to the catalytic mechanism of EGV, such as the conserved HFD motif. Nevertheless, changes in the catalytic environment are observed in the protein model, influencing its mode of action. The lack of catalytic activity of this expansin and its preference for cellulose are discussed in light of the structural information obtained from the VpEXPA2 protein model, regarding the distance between critical amino acid residues. Finally, the VpEXPA2 model improves our understanding on the mechanism of action of α-expansins on plant cell walls during softening of V. pubescens fruit.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Other 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 11 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 18%
Chemistry 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2016.
All research outputs
#17,758,492
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Modeling
#491
of 813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,639
of 264,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Modeling
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 813 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.