↓ Skip to main content

Transcriptional selectors, masters, and combinatorial codes: regulatory principles of neural subtype specification

Overview of attention for article published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Developmental Biology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcriptional selectors, masters, and combinatorial codes: regulatory principles of neural subtype specification
Published in
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Developmental Biology, April 2015
DOI 10.1002/wdev.191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas W Allan, Stefan Thor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 22%
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 33 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 25%
Neuroscience 25 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Unspecified 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 33 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2016.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Developmental Biology
#423
of 660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,776
of 283,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Developmental Biology
#14
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.