↓ Skip to main content

Associations between oral complications and days to death in palliative care patients

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Associations between oral complications and days to death in palliative care patients
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00520-015-2759-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Matsuo, R. Watanabe, D. Kanamori, K. Nakagawa, W. Fujii, Y. Urasaki, M. Murai, N. Mori, T. Higashiguchi

Abstract

Adverse oral symptoms gradually appear in advanced cancer patients as the disease progresses. We retrospectively investigated the associations between the incidence of oral problems and the days to death (DTD) in patients receiving palliative care. The dental assessment sheets and medical charts of 105 patients who had been admitted into the palliative care unit at our hospital were examined. Case data included evaluations of organic and functional oral conditions at the time of admission for all patients. The cohort was divided into two groups according to the DTD as the short group (<28 days from the time of dental assessment until death) and the long group (≥28 days). We compared the incidences of organic and functional oral problems between these groups. Dry mouth, tongue inflammation, and bleeding spots were significantly more frequent in the short group than in the long group (78 vs. 54 % for dry mouth, 67 vs. 46 % for tongue inflammation, 35 vs. 14 % for bleeding spots, respectively; p < 0.05). Tongue coating and candidiasis were comparable between the two groups. Dysphagia was significantly more common in the short group (43 %) than in the long group (20 %) (p = 0.01), as was assistance with oral health care (76 vs. 50 %) (p = 0.01). Our findings suggest that, during palliative care, oral complications appear more frequently when the DTD period is shorter. These symptoms may be useful indicators when deciding on the proper timing of intensive oral care intervention to decrease oral problems and pain in terminally ill patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 91 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 20%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 28 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Psychology 1 1%
Sports and Recreations 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 29 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2015.
All research outputs
#18,410,971
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#3,573
of 4,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,063
of 264,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#61
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.