↓ Skip to main content

Navigating the Incoherence of Big Data Reform Proposals

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Navigating the Incoherence of Big Data Reform Proposals
Published in
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
DOI 10.1111/jlme.12214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Terry

Abstract

From 2012-14 various branches of the federal government published five major reports that either deal generally with modern challenges to privacy or specifically address the privacy threats of big data. All five displayed serious intent and were based on reasonably rigorous analysis. While these reports, to lesser and greater extents, all expressed the necessity for legislative or regulatory intervention, their recommendations are diverse. It may be that this lack of coherence is one of the reasons why no legislation has been proffered. In this article, I describe the various proposals and offer a critical synthesis, arguing that Congress needs to take up the 2012 White House FIPPS proposals and ensure that data subjects have more control over what data are collected and that the contexts for any collection are respected.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 15%
Social Sciences 3 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 10 38%