↓ Skip to main content

MicroRNAs in cotton: an open world needs more exploration

Overview of attention for article published in Planta, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
MicroRNAs in cotton: an open world needs more exploration
Published in
Planta, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00425-015-2282-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qinglian Wang, Baohong Zhang

Abstract

This paper reviews the progress and current problems in the field of cotton microRNAs. Cotton is not only one of the most important crops in terms of fiber usage and economic value, but also a model species for investigating cell wall and cellulose biosynthesis as well plant polyploidization. Compared with model plant species, such as Arabidopsis and rice, the research on cotton microRNAs (miRNAs) is lagging, although great progress has been made in the past decade. Since the first reports on identifying miRNAs in cotton in 2007, hundreds of miRNAs have been identified using an in silico comparative genome-based approach and direct cloning. Next-generation deep sequencing has opened the door for cotton miRNA research. In cotton, miRNAs are associated with many biological and metabolic processes, including fiber initiation and development, floral development, embryogenesis, and response to biotic and abiotic stresses. However, the majority of current research is focused on miRNA identification. Although several targets have been predicted using computational approaches and degradome sequencing, more functional studies should be performed in the next couple of years to elucidate the roles of miRNAs in cotton fiber development and response to different environmental stresses using transgenic technology. This paper reviews the history, identification, and function of cotton miRNAs as well as future directions for this research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Professor 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#17,758,492
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#2,048
of 2,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,463
of 264,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#14
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,718 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.