↓ Skip to main content

Inappropriate Medication in a National Sample of US Elderly Patients Receiving Home Health Care

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Inappropriate Medication in a National Sample of US Elderly Patients Receiving Home Health Care
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11606-011-1905-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuhua Bao, Huibo Shao, Tara F. Bishop, Bruce R. Schackman, Martha L. Bruce

Abstract

With substantial morbidity and functional impairment, older patients receiving home health care are especially susceptible to the adverse effects of unsafe or ineffective medications. Home health agencies’ medication review and reconciliation services, however, provide an added mechanism of medication safety that could offset this risk.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 101 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 9 8%
Other 27 25%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 18 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,943,894
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,251
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,903
of 136,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#23
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.