↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility, efficacy and safety of stent insertion as a palliative treatment for malignant strictures in the cervical segment of the esophagus and the hypopharynx

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Feasibility, efficacy and safety of stent insertion as a palliative treatment for malignant strictures in the cervical segment of the esophagus and the hypopharynx
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00464-015-4176-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giorgio Battaglia, Alessandro Antonello, Stefano Realdon, Francesco Cavallin, Francesca Giacomini, Sauid Ishaq

Abstract

50 % of esophageal cancers are inoperable at the time of diagnosis, and around 15 % involve the cervical esophagus. The hypopharynx is often involved by these malignancies as well. Palliation of cervical esophageal malignancies through stent insertion is considered limited due to technical challenges, poor patient tolerance and high complication rate. The aim of this study is to review our experience with stent insertion in the cervical segment of the esophagus and to evaluate outcome differences between stent insertions involving or sparing the hypopharynx. We retrospectively reviewed data on 69 consecutive patients that underwent stent insertion for malignant strictures in the cervical esophagus at our Department. Patients were divided according to involvement or sparing of the lower hypopharynx. Dysphagia severity was measured with the Mellow-Pinkas scale before the procedure and on monthly follow-ups. Any complication and its management were recorded. The main outcome parameters were as follows: dysphagia improvement, rate of successful dysphagia palliation (i.e., a reduction of the score to 0 or 1 after stent insertion) and complication rate. Multivariable analysis was carried out to assess the influence of patient- and procedure-related factors on the outcome of the procedure. Stent insertion was achieved in 100 % patients. At 4 weeks, dysphagia score improved from a median of 3-0 (p < 0.001), and a successful palliation was achieved in 76.8 % patients. The 30-day mortality rate was 14.5 %. Successful palliation throughout the follow-up was achieved in 72.9 % of the surviving patients. Complications occurred in 31.9 % patients. Dilation before stent insertion was associated with a less efficient short-term dysphagia palliation (OR 6.77, 95 % CI 1.46-31.29, p = 0.02). Stent insertion is a safe and effective palliative treatment for malignant cervical esophageal strictures. Results are consistent even in patients with hypopharyngeal lesions. Dilation should be avoided before stent insertion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Researcher 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,273,512
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#5,641
of 6,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,025
of 264,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#55
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,031 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.