| Title |
An experimental test of Occam’s razor in classification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Machine Learning, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10994-010-5227-2 |
| Authors |
Jan Zahálka, Filip Železný |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 5% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Slovenia | 2 | 3% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 29% |
| Researcher | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 38 | 61% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2011.
All research outputs
#15,236,094
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Machine Learning
#678
of 951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,212
of 179,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Machine Learning
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 951 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.