↓ Skip to main content

Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Alleles and the Risk of Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Implications for Risk Prediction

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Research, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Alleles and the Risk of Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Implications for Risk Prediction
Published in
Cancer Research, December 2010
DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-1907
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonis C. Antoniou, Jonathan Beesley, Lesley McGuffog, Olga M. Sinilnikova, Sue Healey, Susan L. Neuhausen, Yuan Chun Ding, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Henry T. Lynch, Claudine Isaacs, Patricia A. Ganz, Gail Tomlinson, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Fergus J. Couch, Xianshu Wang, Noralane M. Lindor, Vernon S. Pankratz, Paolo Radice, Siranoush Manoukian, Bernard Peissel, Daniela Zaffaroni, Monica Barile, Alessandra Viel, Anna Allavena, Valentina Dall'Olio, Paolo Peterlongo, Csilla I. Szabo, Michal Zikan, Kathleen Claes, Bruce Poppe, Lenka Foretova, Phuong L. Mai, Mark H. Greene, Gad Rennert, Flavio Lejbkowicz, Gord Glendon, Hilmi Ozcelik, Irene L. Andrulis, Mads Thomassen, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Lone Sunde, Dorthe Cruger, Uffe Birk Jensen, Maria Caligo, Eitan Friedman, Bella Kaufman, Yael Laitman, Roni Milgrom, Maya Dubrovsky, Shimrit Cohen, Ake Borg, Helena Jernström, Annika Lindblom, Johanna Rantala, Marie Stenmark-Askmalm, Beatrice Melin, Kate Nathanson, Susan Domchek, Ania Jakubowska, Jan Lubinski, Tomasz Huzarski, Ana Osorio, Adriana Lasa, Mercedes Durán, Maria-Isabel Tejada, Javier Godino, Javier Benitez, Ute Hamann, Mieke Kriege, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge, Rob B. van der Luijt, Christi J. van Asperen, Peter Devilee, E.J. Meijers-Heijboer, Marinus J. Blok, Cora M. Aalfs, Frans Hogervorst, Matti Rookus, Margaret Cook, Clare Oliver, Debra Frost, Don Conroy, D. Gareth Evans, Fiona Lalloo, Gabriella Pichert, Rosemarie Davidson, Trevor Cole, Jackie Cook, Joan Paterson, Shirley Hodgson, Patrick J. Morrison, Mary E. Porteous, Lisa Walker, M. John Kennedy, Huw Dorkins, Susan Peock, Andrew K. Godwin, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Antoine de Pauw, Sylvie Mazoyer, Valérie Bonadona, Christine Lasset, Hélène Dreyfus, Dominique Leroux, Agnès Hardouin, Pascaline Berthet, Laurence Faivre, Catherine Loustalot, Tetsuro Noguchi, Hagay Sobol, Etienne Rouleau, Catherine Nogues, Marc Frénay, Laurence Vénat-Bouvet, John L. Hopper, Mary B. Daly, Mary B. Terry, Esther M. John, Saundra S. Buys, Yosuf Yassin, Alexander Miron, David Goldgar, Christian F. Singer, Anne Catharina Dressler, Daphne Gschwantler-Kaulich, Georg Pfeiler, Thomas V.O. Hansen, Lars Jønson, Bjarni A. Agnarsson, Tomas Kirchhoff, Kenneth Offit, Vincent Devlin, Ana Dutra-Clarke, Marion Piedmonte, Gustavo C. Rodriguez, Katie Wakeley, John F. Boggess, Jack Basil, Peter E. Schwartz, Stephanie V. Blank, Amanda Ewart Toland, Marco Montagna, Cinzia Casella, Evgeny Imyanitov, Laima Tihomirova, Ignacio Blanco, Conxi Lazaro, Susan J. Ramus, Lara Sucheston, Beth Y. Karlan, Jenny Gross, Rita Schmutzler, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Christoph Engel, Alfons Meindl, Magdalena Lochmann, Norbert Arnold, Simone Heidemann, Raymonda Varon-Mateeva, Dieter Niederacher, Christian Sutter, Helmut Deissler, Dorothea Gadzicki, Sabine Preisler-Adams, Karin Kast, Ines Schönbuchner, Trinidad Caldes, Miguel de la Hoya, Kristiina Aittomäki, Heli Nevanlinna, Jacques Simard, Amanda B. Spurdle, Helene Holland, Xiaoqing Chen, Radka Platte, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Douglas F. Easton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 170 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 17%
Researcher 28 16%
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 8%
Other 38 22%
Unknown 27 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 18%
Mathematics 4 2%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 26 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2015.
All research outputs
#3,515,553
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#2,953
of 19,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,052
of 196,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#37
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.