↓ Skip to main content

T-Duality Simplifies Bulk-Boundary Correspondence

Overview of attention for article published in Communications in Mathematical Physics, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
T-Duality Simplifies Bulk-Boundary Correspondence
Published in
Communications in Mathematical Physics, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00220-016-2619-6
Authors

Varghese Mathai, Guo Chuan Thiang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Lecturer 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 5 50%
Mathematics 2 20%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2015.
All research outputs
#18,410,971
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#1,748
of 2,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,652
of 300,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#20
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,508 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.