↓ Skip to main content

Radiosurgery for Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations in Elderly Patients: Effect of Advanced Age on Outcomes After Intervention

Overview of attention for article published in World Neurosurgery, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radiosurgery for Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations in Elderly Patients: Effect of Advanced Age on Outcomes After Intervention
Published in
World Neurosurgery, May 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.05.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dale Ding, Zhiyuan Xu, Chun-Po Yen, Robert M. Starke, Jason P. Sheehan

Abstract

Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVM) are infrequently diagnosed and treated in elderly patients (age >60 years). We hypothesize that, in contrast to AVM surgical outcomes, radiosurgery outcomes are not adversely affected by increased age. The goals of this case-control study are to analyze the radiosurgery outcomes for elderly AVM patients and determine the effect of elderly age on AVM radiosurgery outcomes. We evaluated a prospective database of AVM patients treated with radiosurgery from 1989-2013. Elderly AVM patients (age ≥60 years) with radiologic follow-up ≥2 years or nidus obliteration were selected for analysis, and matched, in a 1:1 fashion and blinded to outcome, to adult non-elderly AVM patients (age <60 years). Statistical analyses were performed to determine actuarial obliteration rates and evaluate the relationship between elderly age and AVM radiosurgery outcomes. The matching processes yielded 66 patients in each of the elderly and non-elderly AVM cohorts. In the elderly AVM cohort, the actuarial AVM obliteration rates at 3, 5, and 10 years were 37%, 65%, and 77%, respectively; the rates of radiologically evident, symptomatic, and permanent radiation-induced changes (RIC) were 36%, 11%, and 0%, respectively; the annual post-radiosurgery hemorrhage risk was 1.1%, and the AVM-related mortality rate was 1.5%. Elderly age was not significantly associated with AVM obliteration, RIC, or post-radiosurgery hemorrhage. Advanced age does not appear to confer appreciably worse AVM radiosurgery outcomes, unlike its negative effect on AVM surgical outcomes. Thus, when an AVM warrants treatment, radiosurgery may be the preferred treatment for elderly patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Other 4 10%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 49%
Neuroscience 7 17%
Psychology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,835,465
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from World Neurosurgery
#546
of 7,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,493
of 279,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Neurosurgery
#9
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.