↓ Skip to main content

Optimization of dosing regimens and dosing in special populations

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Microbiology and Infection, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimization of dosing regimens and dosing in special populations
Published in
Clinical Microbiology and Infection, May 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.05.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

F.B. Sime, M.S. Roberts, J.A. Roberts

Abstract

Treatment of infectious diseases is becoming increasingly challenging with the emergence of less-susceptible organisms that are poorly responsive to existing antibiotic therapies, and the unpredictable pharmacokinetic alterations arising from complex pathophysiological changes in some patient populations. In view of this fact, there has been a progressive work on novel dose optimization strategies, to renew the utility of forgotten old antibiotics and improve the efficacy of those currently in use. This review aims to summarize the different approaches of optimization of antibiotic dosing regimens and the special patient populations which may benefit most from these approaches. The existing methods are based on monitoring of antibiotic concentrations and/or use of clinical covariates. Measured concentrations can be correlated with predefined pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets to guide clinicians predict the necessary dose adjustment. Dosing nomograms are also available to relate observed concentrations or clinical covariates (e.g. creatinine clearance) with optimal dosing. More precise dose prediction based on observed covariates is possible through the application of population pharmacokinetic models. However, the most accurate estimation of individualized dosing requirements is achieved through Bayesian forecasting which utilizes both measured concentration and clinical covariates. Various software are emerging to ease clinical application. Whilst more studies are warranted to clarify the clinical outcomes associated with the different dose optimization approaches, severely ill patients in the course of marked infections and/or inflammation including those with sepsis, septic shock, severe trauma, burns injury, major surgery, febrile neutropenia, cystic fibrosis, organ dysfunction, and obesity are those groups which may benefit most from individualised dosing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 148 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Other 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 36 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 32 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 45 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,430,308
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Microbiology and Infection
#1,666
of 4,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,024
of 279,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Microbiology and Infection
#16
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.