↓ Skip to main content

Acceptability of Antiretroviral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis from a Cohort of Sexually Experienced Young Transgender Women in Two U.S. Cities

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Acceptability of Antiretroviral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis from a Cohort of Sexually Experienced Young Transgender Women in Two U.S. Cities
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10461-018-2127-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arjee J. Restar, Lisa Kuhns, Sari L. Reisner, Adedotun Ogunbajo, Robert Garofalo, Matthew J. Mimiaga

Abstract

Emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can prevent HIV infection among at-risk individuals, including young transgender women (YTW). We used baseline data from 230 HIV-uninfected YTW (ages 16-29 years) who were enrolled in Project LifeSkills during 2012-2015. We examined factors associated with perceived acceptability of PrEP use (mean score = 23.4, range 10.0-30.0). Participants were largely transgender women of color (67%) and had a mean age of 23 years (SD = 3.5). In an adjusted multiple linear regression model, PrEP interest (β = 3.7, 95% CI 2.2-5.2) and having a medical provider who meets their health needs (β = 2.9, 95% CI 1.3-4.4) was associated with higher PrEP acceptability scores, whereas younger age (21-25 vs 26-29 years) (β = -2.0, 95% CI - 3.6 to - 0.4) and reporting transactional sex in the past 4 months (β = - 1.5, 95% CI - 3.0 to - 0.1) was associated with lower PrEP acceptability scores (all p values < 0.05). Enhancing PrEP-related interventions by addressing the unique barriers to uptake among YTW of younger age or those with history of transactional sex could bolster PrEP acceptability for this population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 29 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 18%
Psychology 13 13%
Social Sciences 12 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 37 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,371,981
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#326
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,571
of 327,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#10
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.