| Title |
Use of Hospitalists and Office-Based Primary Care Physicians’ Productivity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-014-3007-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeongyoung Park, Karen Jones |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 25% |
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 30% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,290,311
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,743
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,994
of 239,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#24
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.