↓ Skip to main content

A New Era of Low-Dose Radiation Epidemiology

Overview of attention for article published in Current Environmental Health Reports, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
43 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
A New Era of Low-Dose Radiation Epidemiology
Published in
Current Environmental Health Reports, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40572-015-0055-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cari M. Kitahara, Martha S. Linet, Preetha Rajaraman, Estelle Ntowe, Amy Berrington de González

Abstract

The last decade has introduced a new era of epidemiologic studies of low-dose radiation facilitated by electronic record linkage and pooling of cohorts that allow for more direct and powerful assessments of cancer and other stochastic effects at doses below 100 mGy. Such studies have provided additional evidence regarding the risks of cancer, particularly leukemia, associated with lower-dose radiation exposures from medical, environmental, and occupational radiation sources, and have questioned the previous findings with regard to possible thresholds for cardiovascular disease and cataracts. Integrated analysis of next generation genomic and epigenetic sequencing of germline and somatic tissues could soon propel our understanding further regarding disease risk thresholds, radiosensitivity of population subgroups and individuals, and the mechanisms of radiation carcinogenesis. These advances in low-dose radiation epidemiology are critical to our understanding of chronic disease risks from the burgeoning use of newer and emerging medical imaging technologies, and the continued potential threat of nuclear power plant accidents or other radiological emergencies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Physics and Astronomy 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,410,417
of 25,153,613 outputs
Outputs from Current Environmental Health Reports
#69
of 345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,396
of 273,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Environmental Health Reports
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,153,613 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.