| Title |
Patient Expectations as Predictors of Outcome In Patients with Acute Low Back Pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-007-0460-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel S. Myers, Russell S. Phillips, Roger B. Davis, Daniel C. Cherkin, Anna Legedza, Ted J. Kaptchuk, Andrea Hrbek, Julie E. Buring, Diana Post, Maureen T. Connelly, David M. Eisenberg |
| Abstract |
Few studies have evaluated the association between patient expectations for recovery and clinical outcomes, and no study has evaluated whether asking patients to choose their therapy modifies such an association. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 33% |
| Canada | 3 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Norway | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 218 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 13% |
| Researcher | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 45 | 20% |
| Unknown | 46 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 16% |
| Psychology | 25 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 54 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,220,018
of 25,269,846 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,642
of 8,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,784
of 169,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#14
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,269,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.