↓ Skip to main content

The mechanisms of granulation of activated sludge in wastewater treatment, its optimization, and impact on effluent quality

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
Title
The mechanisms of granulation of activated sludge in wastewater treatment, its optimization, and impact on effluent quality
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00253-018-8990-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Britt-Marie Wilén, Raquel Liébana, Frank Persson, Oskar Modin, Malte Hermansson

Abstract

Granular activated sludge has gained increasing interest due to its potential in treating wastewater in a compact and efficient way. It is well-established that activated sludge can form granules under certain environmental conditions such as batch-wise operation with feast-famine feeding, high hydrodynamic shear forces, and short settling time which select for dense microbial aggregates. Aerobic granules with stable structure and functionality have been obtained with a range of different wastewaters seeded with different sources of sludge at different operational conditions, but the microbial communities developed differed substantially. In spite of this, granule instability occurs. In this review, the available literature on the mechanisms involved in granulation and how it affects the effluent quality is assessed with special attention given to the microbial interactions involved. To be able to optimize the process further, more knowledge is needed regarding the influence of microbial communities and their metabolism on granule stability and functionality. Studies performed at conditions similar to full-scale such as fluctuation in organic loading rate, hydrodynamic conditions, temperature, incoming particles, and feed water microorganisms need further investigations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 352 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 14%
Student > Bachelor 35 10%
Researcher 29 8%
Other 9 3%
Other 29 8%
Unknown 134 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 63 18%
Engineering 58 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 5%
Chemical Engineering 16 5%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 151 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#16,371,088
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#5,817
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,060
of 330,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#73
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.