↓ Skip to main content

Two-patch model for the spread of West Nile virus

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Two-patch model for the spread of West Nile virus
Published in
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11538-018-0404-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juping Zhang, Chris Cosner, Huaiping Zhu

Abstract

A two-patch model for the spread of West Nile virus between two discrete geographic regions is established to incorporate a mobility process which describes how contact transmission occurs between individuals from and between two regions. In the mobility process, we assume that the host birds can migrate between regions, but not the mosquitoes. The basic reproduction number [Formula: see text] is computed by the next generation matrix method. We prove that if [Formula: see text], then the disease-free equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable. If [Formula: see text], the endemic equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable for any nonnegative nontrivial initial data. Using the perturbation theory, we obtain the concrete expression of the endemic equilibrium of the model with a mild restriction of the birds movement rate between patches. Finally, numerical simulations demonstrate that the disease becomes endemic in both patches when birds move back and forth between the two regions. Some numerical simulations for [Formula: see text] in terms of the birds movement rate are performed which show that the impacts could be very complicated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 3 25%
Environmental Science 2 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#13,902,429
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#571
of 1,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,616
of 330,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#16
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.