↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the inhalation toxicity of kretek (clove cigarette) smoke with that of American cigarette smoke. I. One day exposure

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, February 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of the inhalation toxicity of kretek (clove cigarette) smoke with that of American cigarette smoke. I. One day exposure
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, February 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf00334625
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerald C. Clark

Abstract

The comparative acute toxicity of a branded American cigarette and kreteks (Indonesian cigarettes containing approximately 60% tobacco and 40% ground clove buds) was assessed by exposure of groups of ten male and ten female rats to three different but equivalent (in terms of total particulate matter) concentrations of smoke from each type of cigarette. The smoke was delivered "nose only" using an HRC Rodent Smoking Machine (Mark IV) within a single 1-h period, with a total delivery of 30 min smoke and a 15 min air-breathing period between the two smoke exposures. Comparison of the immediate response to smoke exposure was made by monitoring respiration during exposure and by observation of the animals immediately following exposure. At this level, the only differences observed were more severe signs of smoke intoxication in the American smoke exposed animals which, at least in part, was attributed to the higher concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO) to which these animals were exposed; CO concentrations in the American smoke atmospheres were 2-2.5 times higher than the corresponding kretek smoke atmospheres. Comparison of any delayed response was made by observation and measurement of body weight, food and water consumption for a sub-population maintained for 14 days following exposures. This comparison revealed no differences between the groups which could be attributed to the smoke exposures. Comparison of any lung changes induced were made at two intervals, 24 h and 14 days following smoke exposures. These intervals were selected to provide information on any damage to the lung attributable to the smoke exposures and any subsequent development or repair.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Other 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 50%
Psychology 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,459,393
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#960
of 2,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,241
of 53,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.