↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

If It Is Not Health Care Access or Insurance Coverage, Then Why Do Racial Disparities Persist? ∗

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Heart Failure, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
If It Is Not Health Care Access or Insurance Coverage, Then Why Do Racial Disparities Persist? ∗
Published in
JACC: Heart Failure, May 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.03.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ileana L. Piña

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2018.
All research outputs
#848,452
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Heart Failure
#255
of 1,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,772
of 339,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Heart Failure
#12
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.