↓ Skip to main content

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm arising from clonal hematopoiesis

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Hematology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm arising from clonal hematopoiesis
Published in
International Journal of Hematology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12185-018-2461-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sakurako Suma, Mamiko Sakata-Yanagimoto, Tran B. Nguyen, Keiichiro Hattori, Taiki Sato, Masayuki Noguchi, Yasuhito Nannya, Seishi Ogawa, Rei Watanabe, Manabu Fujimoto, Naoya Nakamura, Manabu Kusakabe, Hidekazu Nishikii, Takayasu Kato, Shigeru Chiba

Abstract

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare subtype of myeloid neoplasm. Clonal evolution in the development of BPDCN remains to be elucidated. In the present study, we examined clonal evolution in a case of BPDCN by analyzing the distribution of gene mutations in tumor cells and non-tumor blood cells. The p.D1129fs and p.K1005fs TET2 mutations, p.P95H SRSF2 mutation, and p.L287fs NPM1 mutation were identified in a skin tumor at diagnosis and peripheral blood mononuclear cells at relapse. Notably, the p.D1129fs TET2 and p.L287fs NPM1 mutations were observed only in tumor cells, while the p.K1005fs TET2 and p.P95H SRSF2 mutations were found in both tumor cells and non-tumor blood cells. Recent genetic studies have suggested that some blood cancers may originate from clonal hematopoiesis, harboring somatic mutations. In the present case, the data suggest that BPDCN originated from clonal hematopoiesis with the p.K1005fs TET2 and p.P95H SRSF2 mutations via acquisition of the additional p.D1129fs TET2 and p.L287fs NPM1 mutations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 21%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Unknown 7 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,526,668
of 24,716,872 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Hematology
#216
of 1,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,718
of 331,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Hematology
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,716,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,471 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.