| Title |
Evaluation of grapevine water status from trunk diameter variations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Irrigation Science, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00271-007-0071-2 |
| Authors |
D. S. Intrigliolo, J. R. Castel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 8% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,552,608
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Irrigation Science
#22
of 184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,994
of 92,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Irrigation Science
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 184 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.