↓ Skip to main content

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
309 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, September 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00464-008-0147-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Tacchino, F. Greco, D. Matera

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been recognized since 1992 as the gold standard procedure for gallbladder surgery. The authors propose a single-incision laparoscopic (SILS) cholecystectomy as a step toward less invasive surgical procedures. A single intraumbilical 12-mm incision is made, and the umbilicus is pulled out, exposing the fascia. Pneumoperitoneum is induced with the Versastep Veress access needle. A 5-mm trocar then is introduced, and the abdominal cavity is explored with a 5-mm 30 degrees optic. Second and third trocars are introduced respectively at the left and right sides, near the first trocar. Two sutures are used to suspend the gallbladder and to ensure optimal exposure of the Triangle of Calot. Dissection is performed as a normal retrograde cholecystectomy using an Endoshear roticulator in the left trocar and an Endograsp roticulator in the right hand. The cystic artery and cystic duct are clipped separately with a standard 5-mm clip applier and then excised. The gallbladder is removed through the umbilical incision. Of the 12 patients who underwent SILS cholecystectomy without major complications, 8 had previously undergone other laparoscopic surgeries. The body mass index (BMI) exceeded 35 in three cases. Operative time decreased and stabilized from the first 3-h SILS cholecystectomy to approximately 50 min after the first five cases. At this writing, the authors find SILS cholecystectomy to be feasible, safe, and effective.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 4%
India 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 42 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 14 30%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 61%
Engineering 9 20%
Psychology 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 5 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2011.
All research outputs
#7,409,093
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,679
of 5,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,453
of 87,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,984 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.