| Title |
Relation between two common localisation methods for the EnKF
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computational Geosciences, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10596-010-9202-6 |
| Authors |
Pavel Sakov, Laurent Bertino |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Russia | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 31% |
| Researcher | 29 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 35 | 33% |
| Mathematics | 16 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 10% |
| Engineering | 11 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,418,321
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Computational Geosciences
#34
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,429
of 94,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational Geosciences
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.