↓ Skip to main content

Random Walk Quantum Clustering Algorithm Based on Space

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Theoretical Physics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Random Walk Quantum Clustering Algorithm Based on Space
Published in
International Journal of Theoretical Physics, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10773-018-3663-0
Authors

Shufen Xiao, Yumin Dong, Hongyang Ma

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,483,282
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Theoretical Physics
#912
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,951
of 441,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Theoretical Physics
#11
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.