| Title |
History of Use and Trade of Agarwood
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12231-018-9408-4 |
| Authors |
Arlene López-Sampson, Tony Page |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 182 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 79 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 20% |
| Unknown | 84 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,070,492
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#51
of 858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,766
of 333,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them