↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacokinetics of temazepam after day-time and night-time oral administration

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, March 1987
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacokinetics of temazepam after day-time and night-time oral administration
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, March 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf00544571
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. O. Müller, M. Van Dyk, H. K. L. Hundt, A. L. Joubert, H. G. Luus, G. Groenewoud, G. C. Dunbar

Abstract

The pharmacokinetic disposition of temazepam was compared after a day-time and night-time dose in an open randomised crossover study. Twelve healthy male volunteers received a single oral dose of 20 mg temazepam in a soft gelatine capsule at 0900 h or 2200 h. Blood samples were taken immediately before dosing and at selected times over the 36-h period after each dose. The absorption of temazepam was slower after evening administration; the absorption half-life and time to reach maximal plasma concentration being 0.53 h and 1.67 h respectively, compared to 0.38 h and 1.02 h following morning administration. Considering distribution characteristics, evening administration produced a lower peak plasma temazepam concentration (362 ng/ml) compared with a day-time level of 510 ng/ml. Distribution half-life after night-time administration was increased compared with day-time administration (1.76 h vs 1.03 h). A significantly higher percentage of the drug, relative to Cmax, remained in the plasma at 8 and 24 h after evening dosing (39.3 and 15.4% compared to 24.7 and 11.2% following day-time administration). In spite of the half-lives of absorption, distribution and elimination all being longer after the evening dose, the overall bioavailability, as measured by the area under the curve (AUC) was comparable after the two times of administration. Similarly the difference in the mean residence time (MRT) of the two doses was within accepted limits. It is concluded that a chronopharmacokinetic effect was seen for temazepam; however it is unlikely to be of any clinical significance.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 36%
Unspecified 3 6%
Researcher 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 21 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Unspecified 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 23 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,699,958
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#452
of 2,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,301
of 11,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them