You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Definition of subtypes of essential thrombocythaemia and relation to polycythaemia vera based on JAK2 V617F mutation status: a prospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, December 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67785-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter J Campbell, Linda M Scott, Georgina Buck, Keith Wheatley, Clare L East, Joanne T Marsden, Audrey Duffy, Elaine M Boyd, Anthony J Bench, Mike A Scott, George S Vassiliou, Donald W Milligan, Steve R Smith, Wendy N Erber, David Bareford, Bridget S Wilkins, John T Reilly, Claire N Harrison, Anthony R Green, on behalf of the United Kingdom Myeloproliferative Disorders Study Group, the Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party, the Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 171 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 19% |
| Researcher | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 25% |
| Unknown | 25 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,415,510
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#16,723
of 42,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,747
of 160,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#59
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.