| Title |
Charge Separation Mechanisms in Clouds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Space Science Reviews, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11214-008-9345-0 |
| Authors |
Clive Saunders |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 161 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 21% |
| Researcher | 34 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 57 | 34% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 26 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 12% |
| Engineering | 17 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 33 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#548
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,230
of 96,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.