↓ Skip to main content

A Critical Review of Self-perceptions and the Positive Illusory Bias in Children with ADHD

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
407 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
Title
A Critical Review of Self-perceptions and the Positive Illusory Bias in Children with ADHD
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10567-007-0027-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Sarno Owens, Matthew E. Goldfine, Nicole M. Evangelista, Betsy Hoza, Nina M. Kaiser

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
United States 3 1%
Israel 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 268 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 27%
Student > Master 43 16%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Researcher 26 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 9%
Other 45 16%
Unknown 36 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 156 56%
Social Sciences 27 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 8%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 1%
Other 15 5%
Unknown 44 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2012.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#287
of 412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,867
of 85,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them