| Title |
Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-4755-6-17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ghazi O Tadmouri, Pratibha Nair, Tasneem Obeid, Mahmoud T Al Ali, Najib Al Khaja, Hanan A Hamamy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 591 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 69 | 12% |
| France | 21 | 4% |
| Germany | 19 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 3% |
| Canada | 10 | 2% |
| Sweden | 8 | 1% |
| Australia | 6 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 5 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 39 | 7% |
| Unknown | 394 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 577 | 98% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 1% |
| Scientists | 6 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Tunisia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 317 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 15% |
| Researcher | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 12% |
| Other | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 60 | 19% |
| Unknown | 75 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 54 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 10% |
| Unknown | 85 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 636. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#35,261
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#2
of 1,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39
of 107,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them